Michael Tiemann's blog http://opensource.org/blog/8 en Some news is good news--online coaches will help shape $5 million ideas http://opensource.org/node/366 <p>The August 7th press release from Miami reads</p> <blockquote> <p>Fifty coaches are standing by online to help innovative thinkers apply for the <a href="http://www.newschallenge.org/">Knight News Challenge</a>, a $5 million-a-year contest to move journalism into the 21st Century. The coaches-made up of past jurors and winners-will give News Challenge hopefuls a better chance of winning up to $5 million in prizes annually. They also hope to attract a more diverse range of ideas.</p> <p>The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation has funded the contest with $25 million over five years. Its goal is to discover new ways of using digital technology to meet the information needs of geographic communities. Last year's contest received 3,000 applications. It named 16 winners.</p> </blockquote> <p>And the best news for the open source community? The rules stipulate that applications must:</p> <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/366">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/366#comments Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:19:38 -0700 Michael Tiemann 366 at http://opensource.org $60B less for proprietary software = $60B more customer value http://opensource.org/node/364 <p>Dave Rosenberg <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13846_3-9920202-62.html">has picked up the story</a> being spun by The Standish Group that says</p> <blockquote> <p>Open Source software is raising havoc throughout the software market. It is the ultimate in disruptive technology, and while to it is only 6% of estimated trillion dollars IT budgeted annually, it represents a real loss of $60 billion in annual revenues to software companies," said Jim Johnson, Chairman, The Standish Group International, Boston, MA</p> </blockquote> <p>I agree with Dave's take, which is that this story is very much a glass half-full/glass half-empty story.</p> <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/364">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/364#comments Sat, 23 Aug 2008 03:33:54 -0700 Michael Tiemann 364 at http://opensource.org Microsoft + Novell = Monopoly 2.0? http://opensource.org/node/363 <p>The <a href="http://conferences.oreilly.com/oscon">O'Reilly Open Source Conference</a> is one of the premier events for <a href="http://www.ccil.org/jargon/jargon_23.html#TAG834">hackers</a>, executives, users, and industry analysts to share and discuss open source trends, strategies, and perspectives. It has been so successful for so long that Microsoft couldn't let it continue without becoming a top sponsor, which they have now been for a number of years. One thing that sponsorship buys is a keynote speaking slot, and Microsoft's Sam Ramji <a href="http://en.oreilly.com/oscon2008/public/schedule/speaker/27454">took that slot</a> on the final day of the 2008 conference.</p> <p>Sam's message to the audience, which included leading open source companies, open source project leaders, board members, venture capitalists, etc., is that Microsoft is truly, truly interested in <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/363">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/363#comments Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:58:46 -0700 Michael Tiemann 363 at http://opensource.org PJ's bottom line--a new line for the OSI? http://opensource.org/node/361 <p>Pamela Jones (aka PJ), the <a href="http://www.groklaw.net/index.php">groklaw</a> blogger, asks and answers the question <a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080814141638469">OK. But What Does It Mean? (Jacobsen v. Katzer)</a>, saying that</p> <blockquote> <p>It means that while OSI's handling of a list of approved licenses worked very well for a community made up of FOSS programmers, who are decent folks all on the same page overall, now that enemies of FOSS are attacking, we need a new organization to vet licenses going forward a lot more carefully, one made up of experienced FOSS lawyers, none of them with a history of hostility to, or ignorance of, the GPL, with the community as advisors.</p> </blockquote> <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/361">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/361#comments Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:38:59 -0700 Michael Tiemann 361 at http://opensource.org What Microsoft can do for Open Source http://opensource.org/node/352 <p>This morning <a href="http://en.oreilly.com/oscon2008/public/schedule/speaker/27454">Sam Ramji gave one of the closing keynote presentations at <a href="http://en.oreilly.com/oscon2008/public/content/home">OSCON 2008</a>. He talked about writing a new chapter in Microsoft's history with the open source community, and he promised to talk <em>openly</em> and <em>honestly</em> with us. It is a promise that he made to me personally when I met him between sessions a few days earlier. He also made a commitment to engage in difficult conversations about tough issues. And he announced <a href="http://port25.technet.com/archive/2008/07/25/oscon2008.aspx">some other concrete ways</a> that Microsoft was reaching out to the open source community. But the subtext of all these commitments seemed to me to be a deeper question that Sam is trying to answer: what can Microsoft do to make peace and partner with the open source community?</a></p> <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/352">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/352#comments Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:15:08 -0700 Michael Tiemann 352 at http://opensource.org Everything happens for a reason http://opensource.org/node/349 <p>This week I'm attending <a href="http://en.oreilly.com/oscon2008/public/content/home">OSCON 2008</a>, where the <a href="http://opensource.org/">OSI</a> is celebrating its 10th anniversary as an organization, but that's only one reason I'm here.</p><p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/349">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/349#comments Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:19:44 -0700 Michael Tiemann 349 at http://opensource.org Fair trade coffee & Open source Java http://opensource.org/node/344 <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/344">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/344#comments Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:38:47 -0700 Michael Tiemann 344 at http://opensource.org Open Source and Sustainability http://opensource.org/node/342 <p>Last week I read the book <a href="http://theabundancefoundation.org/small-is-possible.html">small is possible</a>. It's a great read, and I heartily recommend it to anyone who enjoyed books like <a href="http://www.gladwell.com/tippingpoint/">The Tipping Point</a>, <a href="http://www.randomhouse.com/features/wisdomofcrowds/">The Wisdom of Crowds</a>, <a href="http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2007/03/14/book-review-the-omnivores-dilemma/">The Omnivore's Dilemma</a>, and other books that powerfully explain the world from a new perspective.</p> <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/342">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/342#comments Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:51:12 -0700 Michael Tiemann 342 at http://opensource.org Speaking of linux clusters...Roadrunner is /fast/ http://opensource.org/node/341 <p>I was happy to learn on Monday that the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLOPS">Petaflop</a> barrier has been broken. IBM's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Roadrunner">Roadrunner</a> supercomputer achieved this feat with commodity hardware and open source software (including Red Hat's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux">Enterprise Linux</a>).</p><p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/341">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/341#comments Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:19:44 -0700 Michael Tiemann 341 at http://opensource.org 24 Core, 48GB RAM Linux cluster runs on 400W http://opensource.org/node/340 <p>I just read <a href="http://helmer.sfe.se/">the story of Helmer</a>, a <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/">Fedora 8</a> linux cluster in an IKEA Helmer cabinet. The story begins</p> <blockquote> 3D computer rendering are very CPU intensive and the best way so speed up slow render problems, are usually to distribute them on to more computers. Render farms are usually very large, expensive and run using ALLOT of energy. I wanted to build something that could be put in my home, not make too much noise and run using very little energy... and be dirt cheep, big problem? :) no computer stuff cost almost nothing these days, it just a matter of finding fun stuff to play with. </blockquote> <p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/340">read more</a></p> http://opensource.org/node/340#comments Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:20:40 -0700 Michael Tiemann 340 at http://opensource.org